My current reading and TBR lists

Books I’m currently reading

  • Baron Wenckheim’s Homecoming, by László Krasznahorkai. Ottilie Mulzet’s English translation of this book from the original Hungarian received the National Book Award for Translated Literature in 2019.
  • This is for Everyone: The Unfinished Story of the World Wide Web, by Tim Berners-Lee. This one has been on my radar for a while. I’m digging into it now in large part because of Joanna Kavenna’s review in a recent issue of the Times Literary Supplement and comments by Andreas at 82mhz.
  • Attention: Writing on Life, Art and the World, by Anne Enright. I think that this selection from the book, published in The Guardian last fall, is so powerful. Happy to see that the book has finally been released in the United States.

Books completed, but notes pending

  • A World Appears: A Journey into Consciousness, by Michael Pollan. I saw this book when it first came out and decided not to read it just now. But last week I saw this conversation with Pollan in the Guardian and decided it fits well with my current attempts to reclaim my attention.
  • The Last Intellectuals, by Russell Jacoby. Recommended by George Scialabba.
  • Envisioning Real Utopias, by Erik Olin Wright. Recommended by Jathan Sadowski in The Mechanic and the Luddite. (Crooked Timber hosted an online seminar about the book in 2013.
  • Happiness in Action: A Philosopher’s Guide to the Good Life, by Adam Adatto Sandel. Notes pending. A gift from my wife. How could I not read it?
  • All That Man Is, by David Szalay. After reading Flesh, Szalay’s latest book, I decided to stay in his world for a while, so I retrieved this book from our local libary. I read most of it before deciding that I didn’t need to live in Szalay’s world any more.
  • In the Land of the Cyclops: Essays, by Karl Ove Knausgaard. I read one of the volumes of Knausgaard’s autobiographical quartet about ten years ago. I don’t remember many specific details, but I do remember how he created a world that enveloped me while I was reading it and haunted me for months after finishing it. Much more recently, I heard Zadie Smith offer an insight she gained from one of his essays. Shortly after that, I found this collection on the shelves of my local independent bookstore. I’m working through it slowly, one essay at a time. I should admit that I didn’t read all the essays in this collection. I’m leaving some of them for another time.

One of my biggest takeaways from reading Oliver Burkeman’s Meditations for Mortals was this bit of advice:

treat your to-read pile like a river, not a bucket. That is to say: think of your backlog not as a container that gradually fills up [and even overflows], and that it’s your job to empty, but as a stream that flows past you, from which you get to pick a few choice items, here and there, without feeling guilty for letting all the others flow by (p. 29).

I’m thinking I might read these some day soon. I have to admit that it’s difficult for me to stay with this list — I’m much too easily distracted by new discoveries of books both old and new.

  • The Price of our Values: The Economic Limits of Moral Life, by Augustin Landier & David Thesmar. I don’t remember how/when I discovered this new book — perhaps in a blog post? But my interest in it is captured very well by Rebecca Henderson’s blurb on the back cover: “The authors highlight the deep flaws inherent in consequentialism and utilitarianism that are fundamental to most neoclassical economics, and they offer ideas as to how and why a broader sense of morality must become fundamental to economics analysis.”
  • A Democratic Theory of Judgment, by Linda M. G. Zerilli. Strongly recommended to me by a young scholar working with Zerilli and currently writing a dissertation on Hannah Arendt.
  • The Story Paradox, by Jonathan Gottschall. I heard a selection from this book as the reading in a Sunday service at a Unitarian Universalist church recently. My interest in this book and the next one is grounded in my growing appreciation of the importance of narrative in forming our sense of self and our understanding of the world around us.
  • The Ultimate Hidden Truth of the World…, by David Graeber. I’ve been intrigued by this since reading Rebecca Solnit’s forward while standing in a bookstore several months ago, and also inspired by the occasional quotations from Graeber’s work posted by the David Graeber Institute on Mastodon.
  • The Democratic Marketplace: How a More Equal Economy can Save our Democratic Ideals, by Lisa Herzog. Highly recommended by one of the contributors to Crooked Timber: “If you want to know more about how the current form of capitalism is undermining (a thick conception of) democracy, and what can be done about this, then you should read Lisa Herzog’s latest book The Democratic Marketplace.”
  • Arendt, Camus, and Modern Rebellion, by Isaac, Jeffrey C. From a 1995 review by Seyla Benabib published in the Journal of Modern History.

Books already downstream, but tagged for possible retrieval later

  • 99% Perspiration: A New Working History of the American Way of Life, by Adam Chandler. I’m not sure, but I think it was this review that brought this book to my attention.
  • You Are Not A Gadget: A Manifesto, by Jaron Lanier.
  • Joyride, by Susan Orlean. I was intrigued by the review of this book in the print edition of the New York Times. The following day I came across it while browsing the new arrivals shelves at my local library. (When I checked it out, the woman at the desk told me that I was the first to check it out.) It seemed like serendipity, and I wanted a slightly lighter book to take with me to the family gathering over the holiday weekend. So this one jumped the queue. (And now, as indicated by its position in these lists, it jumped off. Just couldn’t get into it.
  • Hayek’s Bastards: Race, Gold, IQ, and the Capitalism of the Far Right, by Quinn Slobodian. Another discovery from someone’s blog. I requested it from the local library weeks ago. It’s now arrived, so this is my window for reading. I’m intrigued by Slobodian’s contention that neoliberals, in need a new enemy after the fall of Communism, decided that feminism and democratic socialism are bringing society down. He argues further that neoliberals hope — or, rather, are firmly convinced — that scientific research will soon show that there really are intrinsic differences between men and women and between races that count against the validity of efforts to bring about more equity in the world. Abandoned about a third of the way in.

Related Posts